Continuous monitoring of an organization’s attack surface – digital and physical assets that connect to the internet – is possible with attack surface management.
Resources
Blog
Blog
Keep up to date with the latest offensive security news, knowledge, and resources.
We get a lot of questions about what makes continuous penetration testing more valuable than traditional timebox testing. Seriously, A LOT of questions – all of which are warranted.
Take a look below, and we’re pretty sure you’ll see the benefits when the two methods are stacked side-by-side.
We get it, regular ol’ once-a-year penetration testing is the norm. It’s what your company has budgeted for, what you’re IT team is used to, and in many cases, what your expected to do. But that doesn’t mean it’s the best way to protect your network.
Think about this: Why would you test your network security from emerging cyber-security threats only...
Oh, the world of good ol’ bug-bounty programs. In recent months they’ve become a hot topic for IT teams looking to unearth vulnerabilities. And it’s easy to see why. They’re flashy and promise the world. Your company gets notified when a vulnerability is detected. The bounty hunter gets paid for the finding. Everybody leaves happy. Well, not really. Here’s why
