Traditional pentesting v. Continuous pentesting
Review the differences between traditional and modern penetration testing
The difference between Timeboxed & Continuous Penetration Testing
We get a lot of questions about what makes continuous penetration testing more valuable than traditional timebox testing. Seriously, A LOT of questions – all of which are warranted.
And many of those questions revolve around what separates the two. What makes continuous penetration testing (CPT) different? Why should your organization adopt it in place of a testing method you’ve previously used? What do I get that I don’t get with traditional testing?
Take a look below, and we’re pretty sure you’ll see the benefits when the two methods are stacked side-by-side.
We’re here, first and foremost, to help you find the right solution for your network security testing needs. That means when you request a quote, we deliver what you ask for – all without marketing nonsense, over-aggressive salespeople or annoying spam emails.
Continuous Human & Automated Security
The Expert-Driven Offensive
Continuously monitor your attack surface with advanced change detection. Upon change, testers and systems perform security testing. You are alerted and assisted in remediation efforts all contained in a single security application, the Sprocket Platform.
Expert-Driven Offensive Security Platform
- Attack Surface Management
- Continuous Penetration Testing
- Adversary Simulations